The scores of AHP, PHR, and PH2 are cited followed by some of the reported perils of the herbs, indicated by the usual three-letter or abstract citations giving the source of the warning regarding the “peril.” EXTRACTS: More than 20 years ago, I started a phytochemical database that gives many of the published activities of the bioactive phytochemicals.

I regret at that time I had no systematic approach to scoring the activities of the extracts of the plants. That is what we usually take, rather than isolated phytochemicals. So, occasionally, too late, I have included some reports on activities (and ED50’s and LD50’s where available) on various extracts of the plants.

We have at the last minute deleted the repetition of the extensive data found in my updated FNF phytochemical database, early versions of which were published in some of my previously published CRC books. Duke, J.A. Handbook of Phytochemical Constituents in GRAS Herbs and other Economic Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992. Duke, J.A.

Handbook of Biologically Active Phytochemicals and Their Activities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992. Beckstrom-Sternberg, S. and Duke, J.A. Handbook of Mints (Aromathematics): Phytochemicals and Biological Activities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996. Where I found no significant information for any one format section, the headings were deleted, therefore, many entries will have only e.g.,


In one particularly useful query for a person trying to rationalize the utility of an herb, one can secure a list of all the phytochemicals reported from the plant, with or without the list of all their reported activities, even calling out a primary or secondary reference for each data bit.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button